Can you demonstrate your RAMS provides evidence of compliance?
Upload any Risk Assessment and Method Statement. See which UK regulations it genuinely evidences, which it does not, and why — free, with no signup required.
Check Your RAMS in 15 Seconds
Upload a RAMS document. See where it stands against UK regulatory requirements.
What the RAMS checker looks at
Hazard Identification
Every hazard genuinely present in the described work, matched against a verified activity library — excavation, lifting, working at height, confined space, electrical, and more.
Control Measures
Whether the document's controls actually address the hazards it identifies, not just gesture at them.
Regulatory Compliance
Clause-level checks against LOLER, PUWER, CDM, HASAWA, COSHH, MHSWR, and the other UK regulations that apply to the work.
Competency & Supervision
Whether competence is evidenced — named tickets, certifications, training records — not just asserted.
Linked Documentation
Permits, toolbox talks, and method statements referenced where the work requires them.
Emergency Provisions
Whether the emergency arrangements match the actual hazards in the document, not generic boilerplate.
Evidence Gaps
Where a required control or piece of evidence is not confirmed available, the checker says so explicitly as a caveat, not a silent assumption.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RAMS checker free?
Yes. Anyone can check a RAMS document for free, with no signup required, up to twice per day. Signed-in accounts get 5 checks a day on Starter, rising to 15 on Professional and 50 on Business.
What does the RAMS checker actually look at?
It reads your document, works out which UK regulations genuinely apply to the activity described (excavation, working at height, lifting, electrical, confined space, and more), then checks whether the expected controls for each are actually present — hazard identification, control measures, regulatory compliance, competency and supervision, linked documentation, and emergency provisions.
Does it just check formatting, or actual compliance?
It checks substance, not structure. A document with all the right headings but no real controls will score low. It's looking for genuine evidence — named competency records, specific control measures, documented arrangements — not just the presence of a section.
What file types can I upload?
PDF and Word (.docx) documents, up to 5MB.
What happens if evidence is missing for a regulation?
It is flagged as a caveat in the generated document rather than guessed at or silently dropped, so the competent person reviewing the document knows exactly what still needs confirming before it goes to site.
Can it help me fix the gaps it finds?
Signed-in users can generate an improved version directly from a check result — the missing controls are carried into SafeSite AI Technology's document generator for you to review before regenerating.